Rescale 미팅 예약


EU PNR: Lead MEP optimistic on prospects of a deal meeting Parliament’s concerns




 디모데 Kirkhope


Civil Liberties Committee MEP Timothy Kirkhope (ECR, UK) (pictured), who is leading three-way talks with the Council and Commission on the EU Passenger Name Record (PNR) proposal on the use of air passengers’ data to fight terrorism and serious transnational crime, briefed the committee on their progress on Tuesday (1 December). The rapporteur, who listed the key issues in the ongoing negotiations, was optimistic that a deal addressing Parliament’s concerns could be struck by the end of this year.

EU PNR 제안은 당국이 테러리즘과 심각한 초 국가적 범죄에 맞서 싸우는 데 도움을주기 위해 항공사가 승객의 데이터를 EU 국가에 넘겨야 할 의무가 있습니다.

Kirkhope는 현재 2 개의 "트릴 로그"(의회, 의회 및위원회 협상가 간의 15 자 회담)가 진행되었다고 언급했습니다. 다섯 번째는 XNUMX 월 XNUMX 일, 여섯 번째는 XNUMX 월 XNUMX 일로 예정되어 있습니다.

He went on to say that progress had been made on key issues and praised the “good cooperation between the political groups” in Parliament. “I am quite determined to reach an agreement that the majority can support”, he added.

On the question of which flights are to be included in the scope of the EU PNR directive, Mr Kirkhope recalled that member states would like to have “intra-EU flights” included. If these are not covered by the directive, member states will “give up any harmonized EU system and will go on with their own national PNR systems”, he said..

On the data retention period, Kirkhope recalled the “considerable divergence” in the positions of the three institutions (the Council had asked that data be retained for five years before being “masked out”, whereas the committee’s mandate said 30 days). Negotiations on this are still under way.


관련 범죄 목록,위원회가 삽입 한 비 운송 경제 운영자에 대한 조항, MEP가 옹호하는 정보 공유 및 EU PNR과 데이터 보호 패키지 간의 관계는보고자가 언급 한 다른 문제 중 하나였습니다.

“Something I am not compromising on is a full review mechanism (…) in order to ensure that the legislation works and is effective,” he said.

당신은을 감상 할 수 있습니다 녹화 논쟁의.

이 기사 공유

EU Reporter는 다양한 관점을 표현하는 다양한 외부 소스의 기사를 게시합니다. 이 기사에서 취한 입장이 반드시 EU Reporter의 입장은 아닙니다.